Morphic Resonance

Evolution as Echoes

Before we start down this path, we may want to check in about dogma .

Material Scientism
thus far

has failed to explain
many of the basic phenomena we experience.

Mainstream Science can be stymied by a two-year-old πŸ§’

Where do forms come from?

How do things take shape?

πŸ”ͺπŸͺ± Why does a worm halved make two worms? πŸͺ±πŸͺ±

How is babby formed?

How do we get pargnart ?

The hypothesis of formative causation offers sensible, predictable, testable answers to all of the above. In short, the answer is morphic resonance.

What is morphic resonance ?

πŸ₯œ In a nutshell

formative causation
and morphic resonance
tell us that:

Forms emerge from
past related forms 🧬

As forms emerge more,
they are more likely to emerge.

πŸ€• When a form is disturbed,
it tends to return

🌑️ for homeostasis is
the goal of life

Evolution as
echoes self-refining.

Here we may diverge from Sheldrake’s work.

Satchitananda propels us out of the ignorant void of all possibilities to pursue a vector of continuous self-improvement into the infinite interwoven dimensions of the realm of manifestation, each quality co-creating its opposite

For every
yin a yang☯️

The rest is just echoes 🀯

from the big bang of that original intent to love ourself and play all the ways🎲